The article discusses the author's exclusive report on OpenAI's audited financials for 2024-2025, revealing that the company spent $34 billion while generating only $13.07 billion in revenue, sparking debate about the sustainability of such spending in the tech industry.
Background
- Ed Zitron is a tech journalist and critic who publishes the newsletter "Where's Your Ed At," known for skeptical deep-dives into Silicon Valley companies. He recently obtained and published OpenAI's audited financials for 2024-2025 — a rare, concrete look inside a famously secretive company.
- Those numbers showed OpenAI spending ~$34 billion while generating ~$13 billion in revenue, a massive loss that raises questions about its valuation and long-term viability.
- This is part two of a series arguing that Silicon Valley is in a financial bubble: startups and big tech firms are valued based on hype and future promises rather than sustainable business fundamentals, with AI companies like OpenAI as the prime example.
- The broader context: OpenAI has become the most prominent symbol of the AI boom, attracting tens of billions in investment (including from Microsoft) despite not yet proving it can turn a profit — a pattern Zitron sees as reminiscent of the dot-com crash.
A financial expert warns that the current global economic instability could surpass the 2008 financial crisis, citing much higher levels of debt, weaker growth, and limited policy tools available to governments and central banks to respond effectively.
The article announces a new platform designed to give retail investors access to Wall Street-grade tools, including real-time breakout detection, AI stock predictions, and institutional buying data, all at a lower cost than traditional professional terminals.
A user on Hacker News reports that OpenAI has started showing ads (for Financial Times, SHEIN, and Amazon Prime Day) within their paid £6.99/month ChatGPT plan, prompting them to cancel their subscription.
A Bitcoin proponent argues that selling Bitcoin because it is gaining mainstream legitimacy contradicts the original thesis that it would evolve from a fringe experiment into core financial infrastructure, and that this integration is the payoff, not a betrayal.