The article argues that developers and users benefit more from writing iterative loops (code logic, automation, multi-step processes) than from relying on single large prompts for AI models, emphasizing that breaking down tasks into loops improves reliability, control, and outcomes in AI-driven workflows.
Background
- The article argues that developers should solve AI problems by writing programmatic loops (e.g., retrying, iterating, chaining calls) rather than trying to craft the perfect prompt — a natural evolution of the shift from "prompt engineering" toward "AI engineering" with deterministic control flow.
- The author, Rico, is a developer writing from personal experience, not a major company or research lab, but the piece reflects a growing sentiment in the AI engineering community as of 2025.
- Prior context: Early LLM usage relied heavily on prompt engineering (tweaking wording), but practitioners have realized that robust applications need structured code around the model — validating outputs, retrying on failure, splitting tasks into smaller loops — treating the LLM as a fallible subroutine rather than an oracle.
Max Weinbach says he had early access to OpenAI's new model GPT-5.6 Sol, calling it his favorite model by far. He highlights that it never gives up and will keep reasoning until it's done. OpenAI announced that GPT-5.6 Sol, along with Terra and Luna, will launch publicly on Thursday, with preview access expanding globally now.
The US government ordered Anthropic to suspend access to its Fable 5 and Mythos 5 models for all customers, citing a potential jailbreak technique that involved asking the model to review a codebase for vulnerabilities—a capability Anthropic says is available in other public models. Access was abruptly cut off on June 12.
Andrej Karpathy announces the release of Claude Fable 5, the same underlying model as Mythos but with added safeguards. He calls it a major step forward, particularly for long problem-solving sessions on difficult tasks, and describes it as state-of-the-art on nearly all benchmarks with exceptional performance in software engineering, research, and vision.
Roman Storm warns that the legal theory in his case could set a precedent making open-source developers liable for how others use their code, potentially criminalizing the mere publication of privacy, messaging, or crypto tools. He notes that developer Michael Lewellen cannot publish lawful code due to prosecution fears, and argues this chilling effect extends beyond any single case.
Meta's engineering culture is deteriorating under Mark Zuckerberg and Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, who have introduced keyboard tracking, reassignments to data labeling, and AI-centric performance metrics. Critics argue this incentivizes performative AI use, drives away experienced engineers, and contributed to a major Instagram hijacking incident caused by AI-written and AI-reviewed code.