The Blind Test challenges users to distinguish between AI-generated and human-created content across images, text, and audio. Participants are tested on their ability to spot which works were produced by expensive AI models versus those made by humans.
Background
- This is a web-based "blind test" game that challenges you to distinguish between responses generated by a cheap AI model, an expensive AI model, and a human.
- The test reflects a growing real-world concern: as AI language models become cheaper and more capable, the line between human-written and machine-generated text keeps blurring.
- "Expensive AI" typically refers to large, state-of-the-art models like GPT-4 or Claude 3 Opus, which cost more per query; "cheap AI" refers to smaller or older models like GPT-3.5 or Llama 2, which are much cheaper to run.
- The game is a playful but pointed way to ask whether the premium you pay for top-tier AI actually buys text that is noticeably better or more "human" — or whether the difference is vanishing.
Max Weinbach says he had early access to OpenAI's new model GPT-5.6 Sol, calling it his favorite model by far. He highlights that it never gives up and will keep reasoning until it's done. OpenAI announced that GPT-5.6 Sol, along with Terra and Luna, will launch publicly on Thursday, with preview access expanding globally now.
The US government ordered Anthropic to suspend access to its Fable 5 and Mythos 5 models for all customers, citing a potential jailbreak technique that involved asking the model to review a codebase for vulnerabilities—a capability Anthropic says is available in other public models. Access was abruptly cut off on June 12.
Andrej Karpathy announces the release of Claude Fable 5, the same underlying model as Mythos but with added safeguards. He calls it a major step forward, particularly for long problem-solving sessions on difficult tasks, and describes it as state-of-the-art on nearly all benchmarks with exceptional performance in software engineering, research, and vision.
Roman Storm warns that the legal theory in his case could set a precedent making open-source developers liable for how others use their code, potentially criminalizing the mere publication of privacy, messaging, or crypto tools. He notes that developer Michael Lewellen cannot publish lawful code due to prosecution fears, and argues this chilling effect extends beyond any single case.
Meta's engineering culture is deteriorating under Mark Zuckerberg and Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, who have introduced keyboard tracking, reassignments to data labeling, and AI-centric performance metrics. Critics argue this incentivizes performative AI use, drives away experienced engineers, and contributed to a major Instagram hijacking incident caused by AI-written and AI-reviewed code.