The abundant but expensive energy source that's under your feet
Geothermal energy, a renewable source from heat beneath the Earth's surface, is abundant but remains expensive to develop due to high upfront drilling costs. Despite its potential for constant, clean power, technological and financial barriers have slowed its widespread adoption compared to solar and wind energy.
Background
- Geothermal energy uses heat from deep underground (hot rock or water reservoirs) to generate electricity or heat buildings. Unlike solar or wind, it runs 24/7 regardless of weather.
- The article highlights "enhanced geothermal systems" (EGS) — a newer technique that fractures hot, dry rock and injects water to create artificial reservoirs, vastly expanding where geothermal is feasible beyond rare natural hot springs.
- The catch: drilling deep enough (several kilometres) is extremely expensive, often costing tens of millions per well, and the technology still faces risks of induced seismicity (small earthquakes).
- Companies like Fervo Energy and others backed by the U.S. Department of Energy are pushing EGS toward commercial viability, partly driven by demand for clean "baseload" power that can supplement intermittent renewables.
Max Weinbach says he had early access to OpenAI's new model GPT-5.6 Sol, calling it his favorite model by far. He highlights that it never gives up and will keep reasoning until it's done. OpenAI announced that GPT-5.6 Sol, along with Terra and Luna, will launch publicly on Thursday, with preview access expanding globally now.
The US government ordered Anthropic to suspend access to its Fable 5 and Mythos 5 models for all customers, citing a potential jailbreak technique that involved asking the model to review a codebase for vulnerabilities—a capability Anthropic says is available in other public models. Access was abruptly cut off on June 12.
Andrej Karpathy announces the release of Claude Fable 5, the same underlying model as Mythos but with added safeguards. He calls it a major step forward, particularly for long problem-solving sessions on difficult tasks, and describes it as state-of-the-art on nearly all benchmarks with exceptional performance in software engineering, research, and vision.
Roman Storm warns that the legal theory in his case could set a precedent making open-source developers liable for how others use their code, potentially criminalizing the mere publication of privacy, messaging, or crypto tools. He notes that developer Michael Lewellen cannot publish lawful code due to prosecution fears, and argues this chilling effect extends beyond any single case.
Meta's engineering culture is deteriorating under Mark Zuckerberg and Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, who have introduced keyboard tracking, reassignments to data labeling, and AI-centric performance metrics. Critics argue this incentivizes performative AI use, drives away experienced engineers, and contributed to a major Instagram hijacking incident caused by AI-written and AI-reviewed code.