The article discusses how governments are increasingly seeking to regulate speech and communication, framing these efforts as necessary for public safety or national security, but raising concerns about overreach and the erosion of free expression.
Background
- "Your Government Would Like a Word" (by an anonymous author on the substack-like platform Expression) is a critical essay about digital ID systems, particularly government-mandated identity verification for accessing online services.
- The piece warns that tying speech, assembly, or news-reading to verified digital identities — even under the guise of "safety" or "fraud prevention" — effectively recreates the permit-and-surveillance systems of authoritarian states.
- The author argues that the UK's Online Safety Act, the EU's eIDAS framework, and various national digital ID schemes (India's Aadhaar, Australia's myGovID) create infrastructure where every online action can be logged to a real person, chilling dissent and enabling political policing.
- "Expression" is a relatively new platform focused on free expression and privacy, often publishing contrarian takes on digital rights and surveillance.
Max Weinbach says he had early access to OpenAI's new model GPT-5.6 Sol, calling it his favorite model by far. He highlights that it never gives up and will keep reasoning until it's done. OpenAI announced that GPT-5.6 Sol, along with Terra and Luna, will launch publicly on Thursday, with preview access expanding globally now.
The US government ordered Anthropic to suspend access to its Fable 5 and Mythos 5 models for all customers, citing a potential jailbreak technique that involved asking the model to review a codebase for vulnerabilities—a capability Anthropic says is available in other public models. Access was abruptly cut off on June 12.
Andrej Karpathy announces the release of Claude Fable 5, the same underlying model as Mythos but with added safeguards. He calls it a major step forward, particularly for long problem-solving sessions on difficult tasks, and describes it as state-of-the-art on nearly all benchmarks with exceptional performance in software engineering, research, and vision.
Roman Storm warns that the legal theory in his case could set a precedent making open-source developers liable for how others use their code, potentially criminalizing the mere publication of privacy, messaging, or crypto tools. He notes that developer Michael Lewellen cannot publish lawful code due to prosecution fears, and argues this chilling effect extends beyond any single case.
Meta's engineering culture is deteriorating under Mark Zuckerberg and Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, who have introduced keyboard tracking, reassignments to data labeling, and AI-centric performance metrics. Critics argue this incentivizes performative AI use, drives away experienced engineers, and contributed to a major Instagram hijacking incident caused by AI-written and AI-reviewed code.