Internet surveillance is driving me back to 1990s computing
The author argues that pervasive internet surveillance and data collection have become so intrusive that they are regressing to 1990s-era computing habits—using offline tools, local storage, and avoiding cloud services—as a way to reclaim privacy and control over personal data.
Background
- The author argues that modern web surveillance (tracking, cookies, browser fingerprinting) is so invasive that using old-school, offline computing from the 1990s is becoming attractive as a privacy refuge.
- This connects to a broader "indie web" and "retro computing" movement where people deliberately downgrade to simpler, local-first tools (e.g., text editors, RSS, command-line apps) to escape data extraction by big tech firms.
- Key context: browser fingerprinting uniquely identifies a machine from its configuration (screen resolution, fonts, plugins) even without cookies. The "Panopticlick" project from EFF demonstrated how uniquely identifiable most browsers are.
- The piece reflects growing backlash against surveillance capitalism — the term coined by Shoshana Zuboff for the business model of monetizing user data — and aligns with efforts like Gemini (a stripped-down web protocol) and local-first software movements.
Max Weinbach says he had early access to OpenAI's new model GPT-5.6 Sol, calling it his favorite model by far. He highlights that it never gives up and will keep reasoning until it's done. OpenAI announced that GPT-5.6 Sol, along with Terra and Luna, will launch publicly on Thursday, with preview access expanding globally now.
The US government ordered Anthropic to suspend access to its Fable 5 and Mythos 5 models for all customers, citing a potential jailbreak technique that involved asking the model to review a codebase for vulnerabilities—a capability Anthropic says is available in other public models. Access was abruptly cut off on June 12.
Andrej Karpathy announces the release of Claude Fable 5, the same underlying model as Mythos but with added safeguards. He calls it a major step forward, particularly for long problem-solving sessions on difficult tasks, and describes it as state-of-the-art on nearly all benchmarks with exceptional performance in software engineering, research, and vision.
Roman Storm warns that the legal theory in his case could set a precedent making open-source developers liable for how others use their code, potentially criminalizing the mere publication of privacy, messaging, or crypto tools. He notes that developer Michael Lewellen cannot publish lawful code due to prosecution fears, and argues this chilling effect extends beyond any single case.
Meta's engineering culture is deteriorating under Mark Zuckerberg and Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, who have introduced keyboard tracking, reassignments to data labeling, and AI-centric performance metrics. Critics argue this incentivizes performative AI use, drives away experienced engineers, and contributed to a major Instagram hijacking incident caused by AI-written and AI-reviewed code.