Pieter Levels' Data Shows Negative Posts Get 2.5x More Views
A data analysis by Pieter Levels indicates that negative posts on social media receive approximately 2.5 times more views than neutral or positive content, highlighting the engagement advantage of negative sentiment online.
Background
- Pieter Levels is a well-known solo entrepreneur and programmer, best known for building profitable online projects like Nomad List (a directory for remote workers) and Remote OK (a remote jobs board). He is influential in the "indie hacker" and maker communities.<br>- Levels recently analyzed his own posting data on X (formerly Twitter) and found that negative or critical posts received roughly 2.5 times more views than neutral or positive ones. He shared this data publicly, sparking discussion about platform incentives.<br>- The finding reinforces a common criticism of algorithmic social media: that negativity, outrage, and conflict tend to drive higher engagement (clicks, comments, shares), which in turn boosts a post's reach. This dynamic is often called "engagement bait" or the "negativity bias" of algorithms.<br>- The discussion connects to broader debates about how platforms like X, TikTok, and YouTube optimize for time-on-site and interaction, potentially at the cost of user well-being or information quality.
Max Weinbach says he had early access to OpenAI's new model GPT-5.6 Sol, calling it his favorite model by far. He highlights that it never gives up and will keep reasoning until it's done. OpenAI announced that GPT-5.6 Sol, along with Terra and Luna, will launch publicly on Thursday, with preview access expanding globally now.
The US government ordered Anthropic to suspend access to its Fable 5 and Mythos 5 models for all customers, citing a potential jailbreak technique that involved asking the model to review a codebase for vulnerabilities—a capability Anthropic says is available in other public models. Access was abruptly cut off on June 12.
Andrej Karpathy announces the release of Claude Fable 5, the same underlying model as Mythos but with added safeguards. He calls it a major step forward, particularly for long problem-solving sessions on difficult tasks, and describes it as state-of-the-art on nearly all benchmarks with exceptional performance in software engineering, research, and vision.
Roman Storm warns that the legal theory in his case could set a precedent making open-source developers liable for how others use their code, potentially criminalizing the mere publication of privacy, messaging, or crypto tools. He notes that developer Michael Lewellen cannot publish lawful code due to prosecution fears, and argues this chilling effect extends beyond any single case.
Meta's engineering culture is deteriorating under Mark Zuckerberg and Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, who have introduced keyboard tracking, reassignments to data labeling, and AI-centric performance metrics. Critics argue this incentivizes performative AI use, drives away experienced engineers, and contributed to a major Instagram hijacking incident caused by AI-written and AI-reviewed code.