AI and machine learning are enabling more accurate predictions across fields like weather and economics. This predictive power offers benefits for decision-making but also risks from over-reliance on flawed models, reshaping understanding of the future and human agency.
Background
- The article is by Jackson Price, an independent writer on Substack who covers technology, AI, and society.
- Substack is a newsletter platform where writers can publish directly to subscribers, bypassing traditional media gatekeepers.
- The piece explores how experts and investors try to anticipate technological breakthroughs — particularly in AI — and why predictions so often fail. It draws on the history of tech forecasting (e.g. Moore's Law, the dot-com boom, the "AI winter" periods when progress stalled).
- It also discusses how the current wave of generative AI (ChatGPT, image generators, etc.) is reshaping the landscape, but that seeing the future clearly remains extremely difficult even for insiders.
- Key context: the reader should know that AI has gone through several boom-bust cycles of hype and disappointment; that large language models (LLMs) like GPT-4 are the latest major advance; and that there is deep disagreement among experts about whether AGI (human-level AI) is near or still far away.
Max Weinbach says he had early access to OpenAI's new model GPT-5.6 Sol, calling it his favorite model by far. He highlights that it never gives up and will keep reasoning until it's done. OpenAI announced that GPT-5.6 Sol, along with Terra and Luna, will launch publicly on Thursday, with preview access expanding globally now.
The US government ordered Anthropic to suspend access to its Fable 5 and Mythos 5 models for all customers, citing a potential jailbreak technique that involved asking the model to review a codebase for vulnerabilities—a capability Anthropic says is available in other public models. Access was abruptly cut off on June 12.
Andrej Karpathy announces the release of Claude Fable 5, the same underlying model as Mythos but with added safeguards. He calls it a major step forward, particularly for long problem-solving sessions on difficult tasks, and describes it as state-of-the-art on nearly all benchmarks with exceptional performance in software engineering, research, and vision.
Roman Storm warns that the legal theory in his case could set a precedent making open-source developers liable for how others use their code, potentially criminalizing the mere publication of privacy, messaging, or crypto tools. He notes that developer Michael Lewellen cannot publish lawful code due to prosecution fears, and argues this chilling effect extends beyond any single case.
Meta's engineering culture is deteriorating under Mark Zuckerberg and Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, who have introduced keyboard tracking, reassignments to data labeling, and AI-centric performance metrics. Critics argue this incentivizes performative AI use, drives away experienced engineers, and contributed to a major Instagram hijacking incident caused by AI-written and AI-reviewed code.