Ethical NBA Championships, Ranked
The article ranks NBA championships based on ethical criteria, evaluating factors like competitive fairness, player conduct, and social impact to determine which title wins were the most and least "ethical" in league history.
Background
- The article ranks NBA championships on an "ethical" scale — i.e., which titles were won most "fairly" (strong competition, no asterisks, no superteams, etc.) vs. which were tarnished by lockouts, shortened seasons, weak opponents, or luck.
- "Ethical" here is ironic/sports-fan jargon: it plays off debates about whether certain titles should "count" less (e.g., the 2020 bubble title, the 1999 lockout season, or rings won by superteams like the 2017 Warriors).
- The piece draws on a tradition of sports barbershop arguments about "rings culture" — the idea that fans and media obsess over championship totals but disagree wildly on which titles are legit.
- The Pudding is a digital publication known for data-driven, visual essays on pop culture and sports, often using stats to settle (or complicate) silly but passionate debates.