"Learning to Replicate Expert Judgment in Financial Tasks" – Thinking Machines
Thinking Machines developed models to replicate expert judgment in financial tasks by training on labeled data from domain specialists. Their approach aims to automate complex financial decisions while maintaining the accuracy and nuance of human expertise.
Background
- Thinking Machines is a data science and AI consulting firm based in the Philippines, not a hardware company despite the name.
- The article describes a project where the firm built a machine learning system to replicate the decision-making of human experts in financial tasks — specifically, loan underwriting or credit assessment.
- This is a practical application of "expert systems" or "behavioral cloning" in AI: instead of writing explicit rules, the model learns from historical decisions made by experienced loan officers.
- The key challenge addressed is that expert judgment is expensive, scarce, and inconsistent, so automating it can make financial services more scalable and consistent in markets like the Philippines.
- The approach likely involves supervised learning on labeled data (past loans, expert decisions) and possibly techniques to handle subjective or borderline cases where experts disagree.
Max Weinbach says he had early access to OpenAI's new model GPT-5.6 Sol, calling it his favorite model by far. He highlights that it never gives up and will keep reasoning until it's done. OpenAI announced that GPT-5.6 Sol, along with Terra and Luna, will launch publicly on Thursday, with preview access expanding globally now.
The US government ordered Anthropic to suspend access to its Fable 5 and Mythos 5 models for all customers, citing a potential jailbreak technique that involved asking the model to review a codebase for vulnerabilities—a capability Anthropic says is available in other public models. Access was abruptly cut off on June 12.
Andrej Karpathy announces the release of Claude Fable 5, the same underlying model as Mythos but with added safeguards. He calls it a major step forward, particularly for long problem-solving sessions on difficult tasks, and describes it as state-of-the-art on nearly all benchmarks with exceptional performance in software engineering, research, and vision.
Roman Storm warns that the legal theory in his case could set a precedent making open-source developers liable for how others use their code, potentially criminalizing the mere publication of privacy, messaging, or crypto tools. He notes that developer Michael Lewellen cannot publish lawful code due to prosecution fears, and argues this chilling effect extends beyond any single case.
Meta's engineering culture is deteriorating under Mark Zuckerberg and Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, who have introduced keyboard tracking, reassignments to data labeling, and AI-centric performance metrics. Critics argue this incentivizes performative AI use, drives away experienced engineers, and contributed to a major Instagram hijacking incident caused by AI-written and AI-reviewed code.