Meta building cloud business to sell excess AI capacity
Meta is building a cloud business to sell excess AI computing capacity, according to a Bloomberg News report. The company plans to offer its internally developed AI compute infrastructure to external customers, aiming to generate revenue from its substantial investments in AI hardware and data centers.
Background
- Meta (Facebook's parent) is reportedly building a cloud business to sell spare AI computing power. This is a big shift: Meta has always been a consumer-tech company (social media, ads), not a cloud provider like Amazon (AWS), Microsoft (Azure), or Google (GCP).
- The move reflects a common problem in the AI arms race: companies have over-invested in Nvidia GPUs and data centers. Selling "excess compute" lets Meta recoup costs instead of letting hardware sit idle.
- Meta isn't competing directly with AWS for general cloud services — it would rent out specialized AI processing for model training/inference, similar to CoreWeave or Lambda Labs.
- Key context: Meta plans to spend $60-80 billion on AI infrastructure in 2025 and released its Llama AI models as open-source. Renting access to that ecosystem is a natural next step.
Max Weinbach says he had early access to OpenAI's new model GPT-5.6 Sol, calling it his favorite model by far. He highlights that it never gives up and will keep reasoning until it's done. OpenAI announced that GPT-5.6 Sol, along with Terra and Luna, will launch publicly on Thursday, with preview access expanding globally now.
The US government ordered Anthropic to suspend access to its Fable 5 and Mythos 5 models for all customers, citing a potential jailbreak technique that involved asking the model to review a codebase for vulnerabilities—a capability Anthropic says is available in other public models. Access was abruptly cut off on June 12.
Andrej Karpathy announces the release of Claude Fable 5, the same underlying model as Mythos but with added safeguards. He calls it a major step forward, particularly for long problem-solving sessions on difficult tasks, and describes it as state-of-the-art on nearly all benchmarks with exceptional performance in software engineering, research, and vision.
Roman Storm warns that the legal theory in his case could set a precedent making open-source developers liable for how others use their code, potentially criminalizing the mere publication of privacy, messaging, or crypto tools. He notes that developer Michael Lewellen cannot publish lawful code due to prosecution fears, and argues this chilling effect extends beyond any single case.
Meta's engineering culture is deteriorating under Mark Zuckerberg and Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, who have introduced keyboard tracking, reassignments to data labeling, and AI-centric performance metrics. Critics argue this incentivizes performative AI use, drives away experienced engineers, and contributed to a major Instagram hijacking incident caused by AI-written and AI-reviewed code.