Anthropic says US export controls on Claude Fable 5 and Mythos 5 were applied June 12 and lifted June 30. The author argues this was performative nonsense, comparing Trump administration actions to "kayfabe" — treating staged events as genuine.
Background
- Anthropic is a US AI company best known as the maker of Claude, a large language model. It positions itself as a safety-focused AI developer.
- Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5 are the names Anthropic gave to its newest (fictional, for this piece) AI models.
- The US government briefly placed export controls on these models, requiring Anthropic to restrict access by foreign nationals. This was lifted after two weeks.
- Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is a Trump administration official. The linked tweet is from a future, fictional timeline where Lutnick holds that role under a second Trump term.
- "Kayfabe" is a term from professional wrestling: the pretense that staged storylines and characters are real, kept up by both performers and fans. The essay uses it as a lens for how the Trump administration treats governance as performance — where what matters is not truth but who has the power to declare what's true.
- The essay's argument: the Fable 5 export-control episode looks less like genuine safety regulation and more like empty political theater — a brief, unexplained restriction followed by an equally unexplained reversal, with no real analysis or oversight involved.
A post criticizes the first flight of "Qatar Force One," claiming a foreign government gifted the sitting US president a $400 million plane, US taxpayers paid at least another $400 million to retrofit it, and ownership will transfer to his presidential library. It argues this would be a presidency-ending scandal in any other administration.
Marjorie Taylor Greene reposted a thread from "Israel Exposed" featuring a website with thousands of videos and photos from Gaza, and criticized the US for funding what she called a horrific situation.
A tweet claims that 9 out of 12 industrialized countries that implemented a wealth tax have since repealed it, including France, citing that billionaires relocate to avoid the tax, leaving a hollowed tax base. The post argues this has already partly occurred in California and warns that a proposed California wealth tax would be catastrophic.
In 1913, the US national income tax began as a 1% rate that affected less than 1% of Americans. A century later, roughly 70% of Americans pay income tax, with top rates reaching 37%. The post draws a contrast as politicians propose a new wealth tax.
Rep. Thomas Massie criticizes former President Trump for bragging about pressuring a private company to give the government a 10% ownership stake, asking why free-market advocacy groups have not condemned the action.