Learning to Replicate Expert Judgment in Financial Tasks
Thinking Machines Data Science has developed a method to replicate expert judgment in financial tasks using machine learning, enabling automated credit risk assessment and transaction monitoring while maintaining accuracy and consistency.
Background
- **Thinking Machines** is a Singapore-based AI consultancy (unrelated to the 1980s firm) that builds custom ML systems for finance and government.
- This article describes a project where they trained a model to **replicate expert judgment** — e.g., a senior analyst's loan underwriting decisions — rather than predicting an outcome like default.
- Why do this? Outcome data (did the loan default?) is often scarce, noisy, or takes years to observe. But historical expert-labeled cases are abundant, letting the model learn the expert's reasoning directly.
- The model uses supervised learning on past expert decisions plus interpretability tools, so banks can see *why* a decision was made — key for regulators in Singapore, Hong Kong, and others that require explainable AI in financial services.
- Broader context: Many Asian banks are adopting AI for credit scoring, fraud, and compliance. Replicating judgment lets them scale rare expertise while staying auditable.
Max Weinbach says he had early access to OpenAI's new model GPT-5.6 Sol, calling it his favorite model by far. He highlights that it never gives up and will keep reasoning until it's done. OpenAI announced that GPT-5.6 Sol, along with Terra and Luna, will launch publicly on Thursday, with preview access expanding globally now.
The US government ordered Anthropic to suspend access to its Fable 5 and Mythos 5 models for all customers, citing a potential jailbreak technique that involved asking the model to review a codebase for vulnerabilities—a capability Anthropic says is available in other public models. Access was abruptly cut off on June 12.
Andrej Karpathy announces the release of Claude Fable 5, the same underlying model as Mythos but with added safeguards. He calls it a major step forward, particularly for long problem-solving sessions on difficult tasks, and describes it as state-of-the-art on nearly all benchmarks with exceptional performance in software engineering, research, and vision.
Roman Storm warns that the legal theory in his case could set a precedent making open-source developers liable for how others use their code, potentially criminalizing the mere publication of privacy, messaging, or crypto tools. He notes that developer Michael Lewellen cannot publish lawful code due to prosecution fears, and argues this chilling effect extends beyond any single case.
Meta's engineering culture is deteriorating under Mark Zuckerberg and Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, who have introduced keyboard tracking, reassignments to data labeling, and AI-centric performance metrics. Critics argue this incentivizes performative AI use, drives away experienced engineers, and contributed to a major Instagram hijacking incident caused by AI-written and AI-reviewed code.