The article discusses basic etiquette for interacting with large language models (LLMs), suggesting that users should be polite, clear, and respectful in their prompts. It argues that treating AI assistants courteously can improve output quality and foster more productive human-AI interactions.
Background
- LLM stands for Large Language Model — AI systems like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini that generate text by predicting the next word.
- This post offers advice on how to talk to these models more effectively, a skill often called "prompt engineering."
- The key insight: LLMs are not thinking beings but next-word predictors; being polite ("please," "thank you") can improve results because the model was trained on polite human text, not because it has feelings.
- Other tips include asking the model to "think step by step" (which reduces errors), giving it a persona ("you are an expert editor"), and breaking complex requests into smaller steps.
- The author frames this as etiquette — not for the AI's benefit, but to train the human to communicate clearly and to leverage how the model's training data works.
Max Weinbach says he had early access to OpenAI's new model GPT-5.6 Sol, calling it his favorite model by far. He highlights that it never gives up and will keep reasoning until it's done. OpenAI announced that GPT-5.6 Sol, along with Terra and Luna, will launch publicly on Thursday, with preview access expanding globally now.
The US government ordered Anthropic to suspend access to its Fable 5 and Mythos 5 models for all customers, citing a potential jailbreak technique that involved asking the model to review a codebase for vulnerabilities—a capability Anthropic says is available in other public models. Access was abruptly cut off on June 12.
Andrej Karpathy announces the release of Claude Fable 5, the same underlying model as Mythos but with added safeguards. He calls it a major step forward, particularly for long problem-solving sessions on difficult tasks, and describes it as state-of-the-art on nearly all benchmarks with exceptional performance in software engineering, research, and vision.
Roman Storm warns that the legal theory in his case could set a precedent making open-source developers liable for how others use their code, potentially criminalizing the mere publication of privacy, messaging, or crypto tools. He notes that developer Michael Lewellen cannot publish lawful code due to prosecution fears, and argues this chilling effect extends beyond any single case.
Meta's engineering culture is deteriorating under Mark Zuckerberg and Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, who have introduced keyboard tracking, reassignments to data labeling, and AI-centric performance metrics. Critics argue this incentivizes performative AI use, drives away experienced engineers, and contributed to a major Instagram hijacking incident caused by AI-written and AI-reviewed code.