How eveRy webSite is tRacking you 24/7. SiTe STaMpS
The article explains how websites use "site stamps" or digital fingerprinting techniques to continuously track users across the web. It details methods such as browser fingerprinting, cookies, and other tracking mechanisms that allow websites to monitor user behavior around the clock, often without the user's explicit knowledge or consent.
Background
- **Site Stamps** are a digital fingerprinting technique that embeds hidden tracking data directly into a browser's graphics pipeline, typically via Canvas or WebGL APIs. Unlike cookies, they persist even after clearing browser history and work across browsers and private/incognito modes.
- **Fingerprinting** (the broader category) identifies users by collecting unique device/browser characteristics — screen resolution, installed fonts, GPU model, OS — rather than storing a file on the device. Site Stamps are a more aggressive, hard-to-detect variant.
- **Why it matters**: This undermines user control over privacy. Since the tracking is baked into how the browser renders images, normal anti-tracking tools (ad blockers, cookie deleters) don't catch it. Regulators and privacy advocates are increasingly scrutinizing such persistent, opaque tracking methods.
- **Prior context**: The EU's GDPR and California's CCPA require user consent for tracking, but fingerprinting techniques often operate in a legal gray area. Major browsers (Safari, Firefox) have begun blocking known fingerprinting vectors, but the arms race continues.
Max Weinbach says he had early access to OpenAI's new model GPT-5.6 Sol, calling it his favorite model by far. He highlights that it never gives up and will keep reasoning until it's done. OpenAI announced that GPT-5.6 Sol, along with Terra and Luna, will launch publicly on Thursday, with preview access expanding globally now.
The US government ordered Anthropic to suspend access to its Fable 5 and Mythos 5 models for all customers, citing a potential jailbreak technique that involved asking the model to review a codebase for vulnerabilities—a capability Anthropic says is available in other public models. Access was abruptly cut off on June 12.
Andrej Karpathy announces the release of Claude Fable 5, the same underlying model as Mythos but with added safeguards. He calls it a major step forward, particularly for long problem-solving sessions on difficult tasks, and describes it as state-of-the-art on nearly all benchmarks with exceptional performance in software engineering, research, and vision.
Roman Storm warns that the legal theory in his case could set a precedent making open-source developers liable for how others use their code, potentially criminalizing the mere publication of privacy, messaging, or crypto tools. He notes that developer Michael Lewellen cannot publish lawful code due to prosecution fears, and argues this chilling effect extends beyond any single case.
Meta's engineering culture is deteriorating under Mark Zuckerberg and Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, who have introduced keyboard tracking, reassignments to data labeling, and AI-centric performance metrics. Critics argue this incentivizes performative AI use, drives away experienced engineers, and contributed to a major Instagram hijacking incident caused by AI-written and AI-reviewed code.