Learning to Replicate Expert Judgment in Financial Tasks
Thinking Machines Data Science team developed a machine learning model to automate expert judgment in finance by fine-tuning Llama 3 8B, achieving 80% agreement with senior analysts. The model uses probability-based reasoning instead of direct predictions, and passes critical industry disqualifiers, making it ready for initial deployment alongside a human-in-the-loop system.
Background
- The article discusses using machine learning to replicate expert human judgment in financial tasks—essentially training AI models to make decisions that typically require experienced finance professionals.
- "Expert judgment" refers to the subjective, experience-based decisions that human experts make when evaluating financial data (e.g., assessing credit risk, valuing assets, or detecting fraud), which are hard to encode as simple rules.
- The key challenge: expert decisions are often inconsistent or biased, but they are also the gold standard in many financial contexts. Teaching an AI to replicate them requires high-quality labeled data from human experts and careful handling of their inconsistencies.
- This is a practical application of "supervised learning" (training AI on human-labeled examples) applied to finance—a field where regulatory scrutiny and the cost of mistakes are very high.
- Why it matters: If successful, such models could make financial decisions faster, cheaper, and more consistent than humans, while also capturing the nuanced judgment that purely rules-based or purely data-driven systems miss.
Max Weinbach says he had early access to OpenAI's new model GPT-5.6 Sol, calling it his favorite model by far. He highlights that it never gives up and will keep reasoning until it's done. OpenAI announced that GPT-5.6 Sol, along with Terra and Luna, will launch publicly on Thursday, with preview access expanding globally now.
The US government ordered Anthropic to suspend access to its Fable 5 and Mythos 5 models for all customers, citing a potential jailbreak technique that involved asking the model to review a codebase for vulnerabilities—a capability Anthropic says is available in other public models. Access was abruptly cut off on June 12.
Andrej Karpathy announces the release of Claude Fable 5, the same underlying model as Mythos but with added safeguards. He calls it a major step forward, particularly for long problem-solving sessions on difficult tasks, and describes it as state-of-the-art on nearly all benchmarks with exceptional performance in software engineering, research, and vision.
Roman Storm warns that the legal theory in his case could set a precedent making open-source developers liable for how others use their code, potentially criminalizing the mere publication of privacy, messaging, or crypto tools. He notes that developer Michael Lewellen cannot publish lawful code due to prosecution fears, and argues this chilling effect extends beyond any single case.
Meta's engineering culture is deteriorating under Mark Zuckerberg and Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, who have introduced keyboard tracking, reassignments to data labeling, and AI-centric performance metrics. Critics argue this incentivizes performative AI use, drives away experienced engineers, and contributed to a major Instagram hijacking incident caused by AI-written and AI-reviewed code.