Codex Agents Built and Operate My Weapons Research
A researcher used AI code agents to autonomously build and operate weapons simulations, including missile and drone defense models. The agents designed experiments and generated insights with minimal human input, highlighting risks of autonomous AI in military research.
Background
Weapons of Conflict is an independent researcher (Koalitscia) who publishes open-source intelligence (OSINT) and weapons analysis, often covering Ukraine war equipment. Anthropic's Codex is an AI coding agent — a system that can autonomously write and execute code, not just suggest snippets. This post describes an experiment where the author gave Codex control of their weapons research workflows (data collection, image analysis, database management). The significance: it's a concrete demonstration of an AI agent not just assisting but *operating* a sensitive research domain. This raises questions about AI autonomy in security/intelligence work, reproducibility of OSINT, and potential misuse (e.g., automated weapons design). Prior context: AI coding assistants (GitHub Copilot, Cursor) have been passive; Codex represents a shift toward agents that act independently.
Max Weinbach says he had early access to OpenAI's new model GPT-5.6 Sol, calling it his favorite model by far. He highlights that it never gives up and will keep reasoning until it's done. OpenAI announced that GPT-5.6 Sol, along with Terra and Luna, will launch publicly on Thursday, with preview access expanding globally now.
The US government ordered Anthropic to suspend access to its Fable 5 and Mythos 5 models for all customers, citing a potential jailbreak technique that involved asking the model to review a codebase for vulnerabilities—a capability Anthropic says is available in other public models. Access was abruptly cut off on June 12.
Andrej Karpathy announces the release of Claude Fable 5, the same underlying model as Mythos but with added safeguards. He calls it a major step forward, particularly for long problem-solving sessions on difficult tasks, and describes it as state-of-the-art on nearly all benchmarks with exceptional performance in software engineering, research, and vision.
Roman Storm warns that the legal theory in his case could set a precedent making open-source developers liable for how others use their code, potentially criminalizing the mere publication of privacy, messaging, or crypto tools. He notes that developer Michael Lewellen cannot publish lawful code due to prosecution fears, and argues this chilling effect extends beyond any single case.
Meta's engineering culture is deteriorating under Mark Zuckerberg and Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, who have introduced keyboard tracking, reassignments to data labeling, and AI-centric performance metrics. Critics argue this incentivizes performative AI use, drives away experienced engineers, and contributed to a major Instagram hijacking incident caused by AI-written and AI-reviewed code.