Maybe Anthropic and OpenAI Are Not the Future of Artificial Intelligence
The opinion piece questions whether companies like Anthropic and OpenAI will ultimately define the future of artificial intelligence, contrasting their safety-focused approaches with Palantir co-founder Alex Karp's view that AI development should prioritize national security and defense applications.
Background
- Alex Karp is CEO of Palantir, a data analytics company founded with CIA venture capital that builds software for government intelligence, defense, and policing.
- Palantir has become one of the most prominent "American values" tech firms, publicly aligning with US national security interests.
- The opinion piece argues that Karp's Palantir, rather than safety-focused AI labs like OpenAI and Anthropic, represents the real trajectory of AI — one tightly coupled with state power and military applications.
- OpenAI and Anthropic are often seen as leaders in "AI safety" and responsible development, making Karp's contrasting vision (AI as an instrument of Western state power) a provocative counterpoint in tech policy debates.
- This matters because it frames the central tension in AI governance: whether the technology will be shaped by corporate safety culture or by national security imperatives.
Max Weinbach says he had early access to OpenAI's new model GPT-5.6 Sol, calling it his favorite model by far. He highlights that it never gives up and will keep reasoning until it's done. OpenAI announced that GPT-5.6 Sol, along with Terra and Luna, will launch publicly on Thursday, with preview access expanding globally now.
The US government ordered Anthropic to suspend access to its Fable 5 and Mythos 5 models for all customers, citing a potential jailbreak technique that involved asking the model to review a codebase for vulnerabilities—a capability Anthropic says is available in other public models. Access was abruptly cut off on June 12.
Andrej Karpathy announces the release of Claude Fable 5, the same underlying model as Mythos but with added safeguards. He calls it a major step forward, particularly for long problem-solving sessions on difficult tasks, and describes it as state-of-the-art on nearly all benchmarks with exceptional performance in software engineering, research, and vision.
Roman Storm warns that the legal theory in his case could set a precedent making open-source developers liable for how others use their code, potentially criminalizing the mere publication of privacy, messaging, or crypto tools. He notes that developer Michael Lewellen cannot publish lawful code due to prosecution fears, and argues this chilling effect extends beyond any single case.
Meta's engineering culture is deteriorating under Mark Zuckerberg and Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, who have introduced keyboard tracking, reassignments to data labeling, and AI-centric performance metrics. Critics argue this incentivizes performative AI use, drives away experienced engineers, and contributed to a major Instagram hijacking incident caused by AI-written and AI-reviewed code.