Most nurses say AI isn't good enough to trust with patient care, survey finds
A new survey reveals that a majority of nurses do not trust artificial intelligence to be sufficiently reliable for use in patient care, citing concerns about accuracy, safety, and the technology's current limitations in clinical settings.
Background
- A new survey of U.S. nurses found that a majority believe AI tools aren't reliable enough for direct patient care, highlighting a trust gap between frontline clinicians and hospital administrators who are investing heavily in AI.
- The poll, conducted by the American Nurses Association and reported by the Washington Post, adds to growing evidence that healthcare AI—from diagnostic algorithms to automated charting—often fails in real-world settings due to bias, errors, or poor integration with clinical workflows.
- Nurses are the largest group of healthcare providers and spend the most time with patients, so their skepticism carries weight; many report that AI systems produce irrelevant alerts, increase documentation burden, or make mistakes that could harm patients.
- This tension matters because hospitals are spending billions on AI, and regulatory bodies like the FDA and HHS are still developing standards for evaluating these tools in clinical practice. The survey suggests that without frontline trust, adoption will stall regardless of investment.
Max Weinbach says he had early access to OpenAI's new model GPT-5.6 Sol, calling it his favorite model by far. He highlights that it never gives up and will keep reasoning until it's done. OpenAI announced that GPT-5.6 Sol, along with Terra and Luna, will launch publicly on Thursday, with preview access expanding globally now.
The US government ordered Anthropic to suspend access to its Fable 5 and Mythos 5 models for all customers, citing a potential jailbreak technique that involved asking the model to review a codebase for vulnerabilities—a capability Anthropic says is available in other public models. Access was abruptly cut off on June 12.
Andrej Karpathy announces the release of Claude Fable 5, the same underlying model as Mythos but with added safeguards. He calls it a major step forward, particularly for long problem-solving sessions on difficult tasks, and describes it as state-of-the-art on nearly all benchmarks with exceptional performance in software engineering, research, and vision.
Roman Storm warns that the legal theory in his case could set a precedent making open-source developers liable for how others use their code, potentially criminalizing the mere publication of privacy, messaging, or crypto tools. He notes that developer Michael Lewellen cannot publish lawful code due to prosecution fears, and argues this chilling effect extends beyond any single case.
Meta's engineering culture is deteriorating under Mark Zuckerberg and Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, who have introduced keyboard tracking, reassignments to data labeling, and AI-centric performance metrics. Critics argue this incentivizes performative AI use, drives away experienced engineers, and contributed to a major Instagram hijacking incident caused by AI-written and AI-reviewed code.