オープンソースの誤った評価
本稿は、プロジェクト健全性の評価に「街灯効果」が及ぼす影響を考察する。可視性の高い指標（スター数やコミット数など）に依存しがちな現在の評価方法が、プロジェクトの真の健全性を見誤らせる危険性を指摘する。
関連記事
Analysis of over 200 organizations shows poor code quality correlates with higher development costs, slower feature delivery, and more defects. Investing in code quality improvements yields significant financial returns through reduced maintenance and faster time-to-market.
The article argues that dogfooding—using your own product in real-world scenarios—is becoming more effective than traditional code review for catching bugs and usability issues. It advocates for teams to prioritize internal usage of their software to identify problems that static analysis and peer reviews often miss.
The article highlights key lessons from two book chapters on code reviews: limit reviews to under 400 lines to avoid cognitive overload, and distinguish essential from optional feedback to improve effectiveness.