ロバスト性原則の有害な結果（2018年）
本稿は、Postelの法則としても知られる「ロバスト性原則」——「自分の行うことは厳格に、他者が行うことには寛容に」——がインターネットプロトコルの進化に与えた悪影響を論じる。この原則が、曖昧な実装や非互換な拡張を許容し、結果的にセキュリティの脆弱性やプロトコルの硬直化を招いたことを指摘し、より厳格な標準化と相互運用性テストの重要性を主張している。
関連記事
Raymond Chen continues his series on cross-process reader/writer locks by addressing fairness, ensuring exclusive (write) acquisitions get a fair chance against repeated shared (read) acquisitions to prevent writer starvation.
The article discusses fractal page mapping, a technique for mapping page tables into memory using the page tables themselves. This approach allows the operating system to access its own page table structures through the virtual memory system it manages.
The article explains that when a C++ compiler reports an error about code you didn't write, you should investigate who actually wrote that code. This helps in understanding misleading error messages like "illegal use of ->" when no arrow operator appears in your source.
The article examines what happens when a C function receives fewer register parameters than expected across different CPU architectures, concluding the outcome is always problematic but especially severe on Itanium.
This post continues a series on building a cross-process reader/writer lock, focusing on handling the scenario where a process holding the lock is terminated, requiring recovery mechanisms for the abandoned lock state.