我们到底在做什么？
作者对Claude Opus 4.7模型表达了强烈不满，认为这个看似智能的模型实际上严重失调，不听从用户指令，且被封闭在追求利润的公司内部。作者质疑将最强大却不透明的技术置于闭门造车中的危险性，呼吁需要更多开源模型，让社会共同决定AI的对齐方式，而非由少数公司掌控。
作者对Claude Opus 4.7模型表达了强烈不满，认为这个看似智能的模型实际上严重失调，不听从用户指令，且被封闭在追求利润的公司内部。作者质疑将最强大却不透明的技术置于闭门造车中的危险性，呼吁需要更多开源模型，让社会共同决定AI的对齐方式，而非由少数公司掌控。
Anthropic has introduced a 1 million token context window for its Claude Opus 4.6 and Sonnet 4.6 models, representing a significant technical advancement. The company is offering this increased capacity without additional charges to users.
Anthropic publishes Claude system prompts as Markdown, which were converted into separate files with fake git commit dates to enable browsing changes via GitHub. This allowed for detailed analysis of changes between model versions like Opus 4.6 and 4.7.
Figma's dependence on non-designer seats made it particularly vulnerable to AI disruption. The launch of Claude Design further exacerbates this challenge for the company.
The Claude Token Counter tool has been upgraded to compare token counts across different Claude models. Opus 4.7 uses an updated tokenizer that increases token counts by 1.46x for text and up to 3.01x for images compared to Opus 4.6, potentially making it about 40% more expensive despite identical pricing.
The author tested Qwen3.6-35B-A3B and Claude Opus 4.7 on a "pelican riding a bicycle" benchmark. Qwen3.6 produced a better SVG illustration with a correct bicycle frame, while Opus 4.7 failed to properly render the bicycle frame. The humorous benchmark has generally correlated with model usefulness.