Ask HN: How would you benchmark your engineering team's AI adoption?
A Hacker News user asks how to benchmark an engineering team's AI adoption, seeking methods for grading progress and setting improvement goals based on others' experiences.
Related stories
Leila Clark defends Jared Friedman's decision to give an AI agent full access to YC's production database, arguing that professional engineers with proper guardrails—backups, documented prohibitions, ORMs, and post-mortems—can safely unlock significantly greater productivity from AI agents, which are often smarter than average new developers.
In an interview, Yuval Noah Harari discusses how AI may serve as a force for truth, among other interesting topics.
The author argues that while no single math field has high ROI for the average programmer, each developer works in a domain where some branch of math could help. They suggest broad exposure to many fields (e.g., via textbooks) is more practical than deep study of one topic, since you need to know a field exists before deciding to learn it in depth.
Garry Tan says Jo uses GBrain under the hood, calling it one of the fastest ways to set up a personal or company AI. Kevin Li describes building an AI assistant that works proactively, completing tasks before the user wakes up, and shares a real-life example of his own family using it.