Skip to content
TopicTracker
From terriblesoftware.orgView original
TranslationTranslation

You Got Faster. Your Company Didn’t.

The article argues that AI has increased individual work speed, but overall productivity hasn't improved because the time saved by one person is often shifted as a burden or bottleneck onto others in the company.

Background

- The article argues that individual productivity gains from AI tools (e.g., coding assistants like GitHub Copilot) don't translate into company-wide productivity because upstream bottlenecks—code review, QA, compliance, legal sign-off—still move at human speed. One person writes code faster, but the rest of the pipeline hasn't sped up.

Related stories

  • While the agriculture industry is increasingly open to adopting artificial intelligence, its underlying data remains fragmented, inconsistent, and poorly structured, hindering the effective deployment of AI tools for farming and crop management.

  • Enterprise AI adoption is stagnating due to organizations struggling with data quality, governance, and integration challenges rather than a lack of technological capability. Many companies fail to establish the necessary data infrastructure and workflows to make AI tools effective at scale.

  • AI can generate code efficiently but fails to deliver a good product because it lacks understanding of user needs, business context, and product strategy. Writing code is only one part of product development, which requires empathy, decision-making, and holistic design thinking that AI currently cannot replicate.