terriblesoftware-org

The article argues that AI has increased individual work speed, but overall productivity hasn't improved because the time saved by one person is often shifted as a burden or bottleneck onto others in the company.

The author argues that AI is beneficial when it augments human thinking, but becomes risky when it subtly takes over the cognitive effort that should remain with the user.

AI companies are investing billions to hire engineers rather than replace them, suggesting that software engineering jobs remain secure despite AI's coding capabilities.

Some engineers dismiss AI coding tools as 'garbage' without trying modern versions, and their outdated opinions are costing them professionally.

The author started a blog a year ago with modest expectations, primarily to organize thoughts on management and engineering. Despite anticipating only a few colleagues might read it, the blog attracted over 230,000 unique visitors.

The best career opportunities often come from identifying potential in existing work rather than waiting for managers to provide them. Recognizing value in routine tasks can lead to significant professional advancement.

The author explains why they stopped consuming content at accelerated speeds and shares a simple rule that changed how they listen to everything. They advocate for experiencing life and media at normal speed rather than rushing through content.

The author explains that as an engineering manager, they continue to write code not just to stay busy, but to demonstrate to their team what constitutes good coding practices and quality work.

The article argues that asking "What do you think?" without first stating one's own opinion is not a genuine question but rather a task assignment. It suggests people should state their position first to give others something concrete to react to.

The article argues that workplaces reward complexity over simplicity in interviews, design reviews, and promotions. It suggests this is a systemic problem that needs fixing.

The article argues that what people refer to as "good taste" is not an innate quality but rather experience gained through repeated practice and exposure.

The article advises that if you want something at work, you should voice it directly rather than remaining silent. It suggests that staying quiet doesn't protect you from potential consequences.