大卫终将战胜歌利亚?Epic诉苹果案
本文探讨Epic Games与苹果之间持续多年的法律纠纷,分析美国最高法院是否受理此案,以及这场"大卫vs歌利亚"式的对决可能对App Store生态和整个科技行业产生的深远影响。
本文探讨Epic Games与苹果之间持续多年的法律纠纷,分析美国最高法院是否受理此案,以及这场"大卫vs歌利亚"式的对决可能对App Store生态和整个科技行业产生的深远影响。
Apple asked the Supreme Court to review whether it was wrongly held in contempt for charging commissions on out-of-App-Store purchases, arguing the injunction didn't explicitly ban such fees. Apple also challenges the injunction's scope, claiming it improperly applies to all developers worldwide, not just Epic, conflicting with the 2025 Trump v. CASA ruling.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a ruling in the ongoing Epic v. Apple antitrust case, which Apple is now seeking to overturn at the Supreme Court. The ruling includes a summary for reader convenience and addresses Apple's argument, based on Trump v. CASA, that an injunction on commissions should apply only to Epic Games rather than all U.S. App Store developers.