感情調節は死にゆく技術である
かつて大人は、腹が立っても大声で怒鳴ることはなかった。会議で激しく意見が対立しても、顔を引きつらせることなく会議室を後にできた。悪い知らせが食卓に届いても、食事は平穏に終えられた。これは「鍛えられた感情の制御」、すなわち何かを感じてもすぐに爆発させず、状況に応じて行動を律する技術である。しかし今、その技術は急速に失われつつある。
かつて大人は、腹が立っても大声で怒鳴ることはなかった。会議で激しく意見が対立しても、顔を引きつらせることなく会議室を後にできた。悪い知らせが食卓に届いても、食事は平穏に終えられた。これは「鍛えられた感情の制御」、すなわち何かを感じてもすぐに爆発させず、状況に応じて行動を律する技術である。しかし今、その技術は急速に失われつつある。
The article argues that to function normally, people must accept contradictory realities: that climate change is catastrophic but also that society treats mitigation as economically unviable. It explores the psychological dissonance required to live in a world facing existential threats while continuing daily life without urgent action.
The article explores how modern society requires individuals to trust complex systems and expert knowledge that are impossible for any single person to fully verify, drawing on examples from technology, law, and science to argue that belief in such "impossible things" is a necessary foundation of civilization.
The article argues that science, despite its claim to objectivity, remains fundamentally a process of persuasion, where researchers must convince peers through rhetoric, evidence presentation, and social dynamics, challenging the idealized view of pure empirical discovery.
Infinitary logic allows infinitely long formulas and proofs, enabling properties not expressible in first-order logic. Key variants like L(ω1,ω) permit countable conjunctions and disjunctions with finite quantifier strings. These logics are studied in model theory and set theory.
The article examines how certain fundamental assumptions in physics—like locality, realism, and continuity—are mathematically impossible to maintain simultaneously, highlighting the counterintuitive nature of quantum mechanics and the necessity of dropping at least one cherished assumption to build a consistent theory of reality.